Gloves and vaginas
For a moment, consider your vagina (or for the menly folk out there, consider your own genitalia but in a different context). Consider what it means to you, and who touches it. Consider the way in which they touch it, ask your permission to get up close and personal with it, worship it and carress it, discover it and explore it. Consider how you were brought up to think about your vagina - a naughty place, a private place, a special place, a great place… the ideas vary.
Think about how it is touched in day to day life. It’s wiped, washed or rinsed, dried, tucked into lacy frilly underwear or something functional, thought about regularly, rarely or never. If hands are near it, it’s often in a sexual manner with lots of connotations of love, passion, caring, friendliness, permission and fun*, and usually because you want it.
*Please keep in mind that I’m not touching on anything other than normal to great touching and views here. Sexual abuse and misuse of vaginas is not what I’m talking about here just yet, ok? Maybe for another day.
There are also no gloves. There may be latex involved, and should be in some cases, but for most stable, longish term relationships, or at least at the baby making phase, there aren’t.
So how then does wearing gloves during vaginal exams as a midwife, change how we view the vagina? I agree that on one hand (ha ha), wearng gloves is of the utmost importance for maintaining ones safety when bodily fluids are around. I’m not debating whether people should glove up before undertaking an exam. What I am debating is how wearing gloves depersonalises the whole process and makes it ok to do things that we wouldn’t even consider doing with a lover, or with our own.
VEs can hurt like the Hades, and are often of no practical use, though employed for lots of reasons. They are REALLY intrusive as well which isn’t really surprising given that hands are being stuck places. Would we as midwives think differently if our hands were ungloved? Would it be more of a person to person contact, with the attendant asking of permission and respect for surfaces and places, rather than a matter of gloving up, lubing up and progressing? I’m not trying to be crass here but the way that I’ve seen VEs done is truly like that - similar to a dentist gloving up and poking in your mouth.
Student midwives probably need to distance themselves from vaginas because of what we see of them and are asked to do to them. They are the most amazing and mysterious pieces of the body to me, and they are beautiful and lovely. They all vary, and are as individual as faces. I feel it an honour to be invited into the woman’s confidence as she spreads her legs and births a babe into the world. But to see it draped with green sheets, disinfected and probed, detached from the woman it is part of, set aside from the emotion and pain involved in birth, bothers me to the core. To see VEs done "to check progress" when it’s clear that the babe is not being born right this second, and so progress is somewhere less than stage 2, and all that it’s going to do is disappoint the woman and give the midwife something to write on the partogram, makes me so sad.
Perhaps this dehumanisation is part of why c-section rates are sky rocketing. Women can’t cope with the assult on their vagina and go into the fight-or-flight reaction we all have to assults of our person, and labour stalls.
How could you possibly expect any other animal to birth the way we do, under lights, with invasive procedures, monitors, machines that go ping, a revolving door of staff and few familiar faces?




