Maternity Services Review for Australia
What an exciting day for maternity care in Australia! We stand on the threshold of change and the possibilities are endless.
Hang on - haven’t we been here before? Why do I get a sense of de ja vu? Well, we have had a large number of these in the past with no change whatsoever, so I’m not holding my breath.
Details and ways to make submisions are here on the Department of Health and Ageing’s website. Submissions close end of October, with the review to be released next year.
What I’m worried about is that it will become a turf war between doctors and midwives, between doctors and hospitals and midwives, between women and insurers and generally everyone who has something to say about it. We don’t need a turf war - that’s already been had, and the women lost (I’ll leave debates as to who won up to other people, because I don’t actually care beyond that one statement).
There is a need for reform because women only get choice and continuity of care and carer when they pay for it out of pocket, and even then it’s sometimes a figment of someone else’s imagination that continuity is what they get… but when women will settle for their ob being there for 15 minutes for the arrival bit of their birth, or the 1/2 hour it takes to do a c-section, thinking that that’s good service because they know who he is, then there is something screwy with the system. Same with settling for having a complete stranger of a midwife because yours has "timed out" for that day or week.
The focus needs to be on what women want and need. This is a spectrum of things, from "unassisted birth with an easy path to registering their child" through midwife-attended or -assisted homebirths, into small hospitals, through to tertiary hospitals and then out the other side into private hospitals and private obstetricians. To name just a few of the options.
I’d like to see something like New Zealand has, where the money follows the woman around. This could mean that obstetricians earn less and midwives earn more. It could mean that homebirth numbers rise because it is a SAFE option for birth, and possibly the safest but not the most socially acceptable still (I’m working on that). It should mean that more women have the chance to get to know their caregivers, and have them attend their birth, if that’s what they want. Lots of women don’t know anything different from the fragmented care system that exists and is delivered to the masses. Education as to their options, beyond this, need to be supported by the money.
Women can want all they like in the direction of a private midwife and a homebirth, but when their private obstetrician and a 6 day stay in hospital is "free" under private health insurance and Medicare, and a private midwife and homebirth is $3000+, and a public hospital birth is free, it can be a hard decision to make. Families make the decision to homebirth regardless of the cost only when they see the benefits and for a lot of people, there aren’t any because they can’t see them (fish, water, same analogy…). Same with birthing with an epidural or not - some would say they’d never go to a dentist without anaesthetic and others would say it’s a huge interference in the natural order of things.
Way off track from saying - go forth and read and respond, for tomorrow or next year or next decade, it may be you or someone you love or someone you know who’s making these choices.




